After the October Notebook event, the hopes of Apple releasing a netbook seemed gone. Steve Jobs said during a question and answer session that ¡°we¡¯ll see how it goes¡±. At the time of that announcement, Jobs said the market was too small.
But you have to wonder whether Apple was fully telling the truth or not. Steve may have been right, in saying that they weren¡¯t releasing on one NOW [at the time of the event, October 14th] but who knows how far ¡®away¡¯ that technology is. The technology is there, they have created the Macbook Air which is smaller and light weight compared to their other notebooks, it¡¯s just a matter of when Apple will get it to their standards.
Besides technology, another factor going into his comments, I believe, is that Apple never wants to take sales away from their own products. Why tell people a netbook is coming soon, when you can tell them to buy a Macbook, then in a few months release the Netbook [or Macbook Mini]. Now I¡¯m not saying this is a bad thing, or that Apple is a liar and shouldn¡¯t be trusted, in fact its good business. Apple¡¯s business model is quite impressive, considering you can¡¯t go anywhere without seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing i-Something. So for they to hold off on the netbook to make way for their new product line is a no brainer.
You could also argue that the $999 Macbook IS a [high-end] netbook. Granted it¡¯s larger, bulkier, and more expensive then your typical netbook, it does off the same functionality [and more] while still costing much less than a typical Apple notebook.
As Apple updates their notebooks to look more like the Macbook Air [and iMac], I believe there is an immense potential to streamline Apple¡¯s ENTIRE product line. Right now, the iPod has the Shuffle, Nano, Classic, and Touch; the notebooks are: Macbook, Macbook Pro, Macbook Air; and the desktops are: Mac Pro, iMac, and Mac Mini. Now there are a lot of names that cross between these product lines, and while I don¡¯t think it¡¯s that confusing, I think they could use some better strategies to condense them into easier categories.
Since Apple released their first iMac, they have been trying to serve two types of customers, the hardcore, power-users and the average user. Since then, Apple has broadened their scope, offereing many different models in between, to accomodate for any type of user. They have created models both below, and above their flagship products that do this very well. But I think with all of these different models and names, it¡¯s a little disshovelled.
To combat this, Apple could relaunch a whole new tiered system. This would create a bridge between product lines as well as creating an easier purchasing system for those looking to buy a product in a different line. Like Apple has been doing, it would integrate this new color scheme of Aluminum body with black accents on all of its products [including black key's on keyboards]. From their desktops, to monitors, to notebooks, to iPod¡¯s. The only exception is for the iPod Nano which would be the entry level iPod and come in many colors [as it does now]. Not only would the color scheme match, but the product lines in general would interweave. My proposal would be to create a four tier product system throughout the three lines:
* Nano
-The iPod Nano is one of the top selling iPods of all time. With a flexible amount of storage for a small price, it is a great entry product. This would mean the elimination of the iPod Shuffle, unless they keep it as its seperate entity.
-The Macbook Nano would be Apple¡¯s first netbook. I mentioned an Apple netbook above, so there¡¯s not much else to say. It would take the same aluminum casing as the current macbook, just with an 8-93 screen, no super drive, far less ports [maybe 2 USB, 1 mini-display, headphone/microphone]. This, however, would replace the Macbook Air because of it¡¯s light weight, portability, and cheaper pricepoint.
Free
Camcolada 1.0.7 download -The Mac Nano [or Mac Mini] would, for the most part stay the same. Obviously it would be great for some spec bumps, but not too much to interfere with the iMac.
* ¡®Classic¡¯
-The iPod Classic [or just iPod (6G)] would be more similar to older versions of the iPod. Priced between 200-250, it would be 40-60 GB [being a good mid-range iPod].
-The iMac is a great desktop product that needs not be changed. Don¡¯t fix what¡¯s not broken.
-The MacBook [or iBook] is much like the iMac in the sense that it doesn¡¯t need too many modifications.
* Pro
-The iPod Pro is some what of a toss-up. Apple could use this as their huge-storage iPod [100GB+] and leave the iPod classic to 40-60GB, or they could do something completely revolutionary like the iPod nano, and introduce a accelorometer for tilt functionality.
-The Macbook Pro would stay the same. Keeping the same look as it has now [aluminum with black surrounding screen].
